I undoubtedly have readers here and friends on
social media who think I'm a little unhinged for harping on the 2003 U.S. war
in Iraq so much almost 13 years after it begun. That war undoubtedly occupies an out-sized
place for me and some others of my generation...it was the first
"event" that I seriously followed, and for months I debated it daily
in my junior U.S. history class with the teacher who force-fed us daily doses
of FOX News, which along with most of the supposedly “liberal” media beat the
war drums with feverish abandon. People
I knew in high school were sent off to die in a purposeless conflict.
It is for these reasons and others that I am
appalled that the Democratic Party looks capable of nominating a candidate for
the presidency who voted for that war. The Bush administration was transparent
in the dishonesty of its arguments for the war and as a teenager who read the
newspaper daily even I could see that the evidence didn't add up or make any
sense.
Hillary Clinton voted
to authorize that war. As a result,
thousands of U.S. citizens died. Hundreds
of thousands of Iraqis were killed, and the institutions and infrastructure of
their country were obliterated. Not all
of these were praiseworthy, and many were downright despicable, but
institutions and infrastructure are all that can tie together a country that
was the product of an imperial imagination in the early 20th
century.
The war that Hillary
Clinton supported strengthened Al Qaeda, which the Bush administration (led by
Dick Cheney) lied about having a presence in Iraq prior to our invasion. The war that Hillary Clinton supported helped
to spawn ISIS, a horrific reaction to the death cult of neo-conservatism
apparently embraced by Clinton.
Because although
Clinton and her campaign have been working overtime to reassure voters that her
vote for this war was an aberration, her actions as Senator, as presidential
candidate, and as Secretary of State demonstrate that she shares the
neo-conservatives’ admiration of authoritarianism, their embrace of violence
and terror, and their defense of colonialism.
As Secretary of State, she
advocated for the “surge” in Afghanistan that put more and more U.S. citizens
in harm’s way while delivering little in terms of institution-building for
Afghans. She advocated for regime change
in Libya, typically not bothering to think through the consequences. All those who feel the temptation to meddle
must also consider whether their intervention will actually do good for those
whose lives they seek to restructure, and Clinton has omitted to do so time and
again. She was also an advocate for
large-scale intervention in Syria, and happily our President resisted the temptation
to follow her advice.
During the Arab Spring,
a series of grassroots uprisings across the Middle East mounted by citizens and
subjects against dictatorial regimes, Clinton took the side of the autocrats
against the democrats, prizing stability over change much as she appears to do
based on the little we know of her speeches to Goldman Sachs.
As Senator, as
Secretary of State, and as presidential candidate Clinton has supported
colonial regimes which have no place in the 21st century. She has supported them (in Israel and
Morocco) to the detriment of their country’s citizens and institutions, to the
detriment of the colonized people, and to the detriment of our own country’s
security. She has backed colonial
governments and the savagery that accompanies colonial warfare in the knowledge
that nothing good can come of such an unequal relationship for any of the
parties involved.
In all of her roles
Clinton has defended the actions of a rogue security state. She has defended it against whistleblowers
and journalists, serving a term that surpassed even the imperial Bush administration
in the fervor with which it attacked these brave individuals who seek to bring
the truth to the public. She has given
fulsome backing to a drone war that is nothing more than an international
version of the profiling and killing that many of her supporters are willing to
condemn when it occurs on our own streets.
The use of disposition matrices and other profiling mechanisms make a
mockery of justice and claim the lives of thousands of innocent people. War waged from the air has destroyed hospitals
and schools and countless lives, in clear violation of international laws,
without consequences for those who perpetrate or make possible such violence.
My generation together
with those that follow have borne and will continue to bear the brunt of
Clinton’s murderous hubris. Young people
of my generation were asked to fight and die in Iraq and Afghanistan in illegal
and immoral wars of aggression. My
generation and particularly those that have come after it—my students today—are
suffering the consequences of our economy having been subverted so fully to a
war-making machine that gobbles up endless resources while we are told that the
free higher education and stronger welfare state that older generations enjoyed
is something we can never aspire to.
So if as a reader or a
friend or an acquaintance you wonder why I keep writing about Iraq, I offer
this as a reminder and an explanation. Aside
from the immorality of U.S. imperialism, and the self-defeating wars that we incessantly
wage, there is something very close to home about this conflict. It made the world I grew up in in so many
ways and I find it grotesque that people can forgive those who authorized it
and then strengthened the logic and practices by which it and other related
conflicts have been prosecuted.
I genuinely believe
that it is possible to turn a corner on this sinister era in U.S. history and
to forge relationships with the wider world based on strong institutions that
we and others respect; on law and order conceived fairly and applied to the
powerful as well as the weak; on a recognition that economic and social inequality
are ills that are as important “over there” as “over here”; and on a commitment
to ending all forms of oppression, whether perpetrated by colonial governments,
religious fundamentalists, or our own state.
In short, we need some form
of solidarity, and institutions to go along with it. Building such things takes hard work and won’t
be accomplished in a presidential term.
But the election of a neo-conservative as compromised by 13 years of
violence as Hillary Clinton will be a terrible setback that I hope we can
avoid.